Lord of the Flies读后感精选
《Lord of the Flies》是一本由William Golding著作，Penguin Group出版的Paperback图书，本书定价：USD 10.00，页数：313，特精心从网络上整理的一些读者的读后感，希望对大家能有帮助。
《Lord of the Flies》精选点评：
●乌托邦的生活还是不现实的呢 毕竟人心险恶呢
●Based on Northrop Frey’s archetypal theory Golding seeks the archetypes of Greek myth and the Bible in the novel, which is tinted with a colour of darkness and devil, mixed with a faint optimism.
●这学期根本就没有好好学这一门课 弄到最后一篇最重要的paper也是如此草率 根本没有学到东西 也没有练到英语 还把自己GPA拽下来 我需要好好反省 多余的话不在豆瓣上说了
●反珊瑚岛（俩主人公名字都一样，让人想起了Shamela对Pamela的parody）反荒岛文学传统的小说。看到第九章以为会写崩掉，但结尾处理的挺好。军官说games和British的时候有讽刺的效果。总体读起来略恐怖，小说后半段节奏很紧凑。但Piggy找”savages”理论和最后Ralph的moaning太清楚地写出来了，有种余味不足的感觉；语言风格也谈不上喜欢。另，真要感谢下戈尔丁让理智派活下来了一个，虽然Ralph最后拿的也是两头削尖的stick。都有原罪甚至innocent evil更可怕，但至少也有个希望的火苗苗啊。
●扣一星给眼花缭乱的环境描写，给我整的有点晕
●Dystopia of the most innocent. Survival of the darkest in temptation and fear.
●读的第二本英文原著，挺平淡一个故事；后面看书评说海螺代表了秩序，自己看的时候没看出来…这个象征还是挺有意思的；“KILL THE PIG! CUT HIS THROAT! KILL THE PIG! SPILL HIS BLOOD!”；有声书里面那个纯正英音的“Are you sure? Are you 100 percent sure?”让我记了很久
●'And who will rescue the adult and his cruiser?'
●破坏、毁灭、打碎一切都是容易的，我们之所以为人，却是因为理性、规则和制约
●201605
《Lord of the Flies》读后感(一)：是什么促使他们变成那样残忍？
这部小说 我是越看越压抑越痛心。但是我真的有很多疑问，Jack他们那边那一伙是否知道他们误杀了Simon ？并且又是为什么他们会变得那么残忍？特别是Roger 基本都没怎么描写逐渐变化的过程，我们知道Jack从最初就变现得很强势一心致力于hunting。但是Roger是什么促使他变成了个terror呢？人性的恶在面具下肆无忌惮。他们将piggy杀死后竟然一点儿都没感到震惊 却深深的震惊了我，毕竟他们都还那么小为什么就将生命看得那么轻呢？甚至为了追杀Ralph，将整个小岛都放火了？就算他们抓住了Ralph，他们自己又怎么能在这个岛上生存下去？
还有在这本书中间部分，Simon决心一人去山顶去看个究竟的时候，在路途上，他碰到了Jack他们那伙供奉的猪头，然后有一段Lord of the flies 给他的一段对话，大意是让他放弃理性 和其他人一样疯狂。我很想知道 这一部分在书中是起着怎样的作用？
《Lord of the Flies》读后感(二)：简单粗暴的人性寓言
《蝇王/Lord of the Flies》像是一本直男理科生写的寓言小说，看了一眼作者介绍，果然戈尔丁当年是学理科的。这是本好小说，优点是很理性。但还不算一本杰作，因为太理性了，缺了那么点文学性的美感（这也是寓言式小说最容易犯的毛病）。一连串的象征性和宗教影射都太过直白，再加上情节简单，部分人物形象过于平面（比如Roger），人性的挖掘也不算太深入，而且作者思维太直线，将哲理直接“说”了出来而不是“表现”出来，导致艺术价值大打折扣。还好氛围的营造和几段杀戮的描写加了分。 整个故事基本上可以看做成一个人类简史，即人类被驱逐出伊甸园的，“失乐园”的故事。不同的是，这里引诱人类堕落的不再是撒旦，而是“蝇王（lord of the flies）”（即《圣经》中的Beelzebub），也就是人性的恶本身。 “蝇王”诞生于一次狩猎，孩子们在岛上的第一次杀戮。在那头野猪身上，孩子们尽情地释放着内心深处的杀意和破坏性，那是人性恶的初次显现。但这时的恶还是面向自然的，直到它指向第一个人类的献祭者Simon。Simon，先知般的存在。体弱多病，喜欢独处，也因此被孩子们嘲笑为“batty”。最早认识到Beast来自于人的内心，甚至为了验明自己的思想，独自上山，与蝇王对话。象征着耶稣基督般的救赎者，最后也如耶稣一般死于民众之手。Simon之死，象征着救赎的不可能。 如果说Simon之死还可以解释为“意外”，那么Piggy之死便是真正意义上的“谋杀”。Piggy，头脑担当，智商最在线的人，除了眼镜可以点火外，几乎没有任何物质上的作用。因身体肥胖和哮喘，被大多数人嘲笑和歧视。相信民主（海螺）和科学（眼镜），也因二者而死。Piggy之死，象征着在野蛮面前，现代文明的苍白无力。至此，野性、独裁、暴力彻底占据了主导，杀红了眼的人性之恶，开始全面追杀最后的善的人性，Ralph。 然后谈谈两位主角。Jack：男二号，野性、独裁、人性恶的象征。从一开始就是一个定时炸弹。有很强的领导能力和控制欲（政治手腕完爆Ralph），但目光短浅，不想获救，而只想建立自己的王国。Ralph，男一号，象征文明、理性、民主。目标明确，有远见，是最有希望带领孩子们获救的比较理想领袖。Ralph的失败主要有两个原因：一是自身性格的软弱。相信民主，手段不够强硬，想要最大限度的利用所有人的能力，也因此过于纵容Jack，没能听取Piggy的意见压制住Jack，结果被Jack反噬。二，也是最重要的，即民众的愚蠢。大多数的民众都是七岁左右的孩童，除了吃喝玩乐几乎无所作为。民主在愚民面前是无力的，所以，独裁者最终崛起。 Ralph的失败，是文明的失败，是人性善的失败。如果Ralph最后被Jack所杀，野蛮人没能获救，人类最终自食恶果，那本作的批判性也许可以再高一个水平。可惜作者用了一个看似高明的蠢办法：让成人出现，简单粗暴地解救了孩子。这不仅让故事精彩程度减分，也让主题的挖掘显得浅薄。成人能救赎孩子，那谁来救赎成人呢？ 最后，一个一直困惑我的问题，为什么掉在岛上全是男孩子-_-///大概作者是想断掉孩子们在小岛上生存繁衍的后路，让成人的救援成为唯一获救的途径。但是感觉这样只是让故事的写作变得更简单了。相信我，有女孩子的话，故事会有更多可能性，也会更精彩，更有深度。
《Lord of the Flies》读后感(三)：The Conflict between Civilization and Savagery in Lord of the Flies
Lord of the Flies comes from the Hebrew language, the original word for "Baalzebub". In English, it is the king of feces and ugly, king of contamination, in the bible as Baal ",or,"the root of extremely evil ". In the novel, and not just symbolizes king flies ugly hanging, more representative of the dark side of human nature is the most deeply, is unable to avoid being recognized.
In 1983, Golding was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature. In Sweden, saying that it is "because of his novels with a clear realistic narrative art and variety of general significance of mythology, and it also illustrates the human condition in the world today." This sentence gives a precise interpretation of the artistic features, that is realistic depiction of narrative and the symbolic system of clever union.
Golding shows us the human society is an epitome of the holocaust, for reasons of disaster, he attributed it to humanity evil, evil is in the nature of human misery. "The beast within" is the symbol of evil humanity. Because people always cannot envisage oneself from evil, then tragedies happen again and agian. In the impression on people from the "innocent" children, perhaps can lead to more profoundly reveals the most easily covered in human nature and the deep side. The boys in civilized societies and cultivate modern democratic consciousness, when deserted in the island they have already experienced a rapid decline in the process of being evil in a short time.It’s root lies in human nature, a kind of corruption of judgment and moral conscience collapse.
ocrates said: "know yourself," is still a apocalypse of wisdom. In the history of mankind, mankind for their wickedness is very clear understood. But people should know his way, the most profound understanding of human nature, such as LiMing philosopher said: "the way human making friends: using the winner to overcome the weakness of human nature, and inhibit his potential in evil."
Western ancient philosophers, especially the prophets are clearly human religions that represent the evil, and all the people are born with guilty, and repent, and sin, only believe in god, can obtain the salvation of souls, namely original said. Chinese ancient sage advocated goodness, Mencius said: "people are not bad, not without water." In the song dynasty WangYingLin "as its embedded:" man is born with good nature. " Chinese and western on the goodness of this evil or on the contrary viewpoint, this cultural tradition of the great differences between Chinese and western culture and profounds influence on the different development path and destiny.
What should be known about human？ Philosophers, human nature in the original tells us the meaning below the integrative triple attributes. Namely:
ａ. the first layer: biological, tends to evil;
ｂ． the second layer: both humanity and sociality;
ｃ. the third layer: human spirit, rather good.
The inseparable and strong points, and aims to more accurately understanding of human nature. But this three-layer attribute is not 3131 averages, otherwise it is evil. Chinese scholars LiMing in his philosophical works in the double helix, use a hypothetical justice, namely, the long history, its inertia, the possibility of changing the smaller, and the inertia and it is proportional to the time since appeared. LiMing using complex mathematical model, the conclusion is:Humanity to evil, 90%,and of only about 10% to good! This is the tendency of human general estimate, if reoccupy historical comparison method, the reasoning can get further proof. Namely, the western scholars' understanding of human nature-- the true basically according with them for good, therefore, the understanding is real and effective accordingly. China ancient saints know about human nature is basically wrong, and does not match the real nature, therefore, their views about the good is wishful thinking but false, invalid, and “self-deception”. Chinese ancient philosophers' lead in “know yourself on the road, so went astray” in 2000 years of Chinese culture in developing state of contradictions, and cannot go out from this weird authority.
Generally, the noval potrays the instinct of savarage as far more primal and fundamental to the human psyche than the instinct of civilization.Moral behaviour, in Golding’s view, is often merely a forced imposition of civilization, rather than the natural expression of human individuality. When left to their own devices, the novel seems to argue, people will become cruel, wild, and barbaric.
《Lord of the Flies》读后感(四)：Wisdom yielded
It is the best world-known symbolism work of Williams Golding. I have approached to the black-and-white film in 1963 of the same name at the first place, which struck me an unexpected terror – A group of children were landed on an uninhabited island, and later pureness turned to evil, civil men changed to savages. Children in their teens proclaiming no devil killed some among them due to their terrors and their different choices between democracy and dictatorship in an endless waiting for rescue. A non-existent, imaginary beast scared them. Dictatorship promised to offer them food and the killing of the beast, while democracy advocated to build rules to operate every aspect of life on the island. The former needed no assistance from the latter, while the latter fantasied the former might obey the rules and together built a better island world.
When inventing this work, Williams Golding was a teacher at school, where, I guess, drew some ideas from his teaching life. School life could be cruel, for tall, strong students might bully those who are short and thin. Strengthen makes sense instead of rational minds. Just as the story on the island went, the fight between them bore high possibility of transferring to a horrible disaster as time goes by.
Three main roles were included in this book. One was Ralph, the representative of democracy. The second was Piggy, the symbol of wisdom. And Jack was the rest, the dictatorship. Among them, I favor Piggy and it was hard to tell Williams Golding’s preference.
The writer was tricky - did not reveal the exact number and each and every name of children and even among those whose names had already told, Piggy’s real name remained unknown. Instead, just tell Piggy’s nickname (That was Piggy). The symbol of wisdom shown in a nickname in the work, which revealed in the island, or a society without rules, demonstrated no respect at all for wisdom. No mater Ralph and Jack, they both ignored Piggy. Luckily Ralph changed his attitude after long-term observation, but Jack didn’t.
Hither and thither lied Piggy’s movement of rubbing his spectacles. In modern society, spectacles mean civil behavior, good manner, etc. When do they need rubbing？ It must has been that they are stained by mud, water or mist. Wiping off these is just like let nothing lead your movement but your brain(wisdom).
Wisdom is invisible but useful. Once it was practiced, it would have changed a lot. In most cases, those who are wise, offer their wisdom to leaders, and leaders practiced it, take Liang Zhuge. Wisdom type would prefer to stay behind leaders, known as think tank, rather than implement their sensible thoughts. This is a quite commonplace phenomenon.
iggy’s wisdom amazed me, like recommending making a sundial with a stick stabbing firmly on the stand for time counting, but lack of confidence was Piggy's weakness, which increased wisdom’s yielding. A not-good body condition-obesity and asthma weakened his confidence, even prevented him from building a leader-like image in front of the other children. The leader-like type appearance has already set a deep root at the bottom of people’s minds. Confidence ranks first and Piggy was definitely out of league. Physical attraction of body really counts.
From above, the magic of symbolism hides in connections. When there is an object, there bears a chance for giving symbolism by your own to guess what and how the writer symbolize one abstract thing with another actual thing. The guess journey sent out fun to every reader - everyone has their own answer first, and then checks them with that of the writer.
Here is my other symbolism guess about Piggy.
1. Piggy got his nicknames because his obesity, which symbolizes that wisdom wins no respect.
2. Every time Piggy wiping off the things that covered his spectacles, it implicated the contrary situation between democracy and dictatorship varied.
3.”Piggy threw a picked bone down on the beach and stooped for more.” quoted from page 209. He was invited to Jack’s party for food. “Stooped for more” described a sad picture. Without reaching the basic standard of life, say food, mental part couldn’t show its amazing ability.
4. Piggy‘s aunt seemed like own more wisdom. In Piggy’s eyes, she is so knowledgeable existence.
5. Piggy’s death represented the end of the democracy world. Piggy was Ralph’s die-hard follower- wisdom supports democracy. However, democracy couldn’t live without wisdom. In the work, Ralph was the only one left about democracy, being hunting by Jack and his people. Finally, he got caught. Fortunately, the moment they wanted to kill Ralph, an adult, the lifesaver landed the island!
6. Piggy’s hair seemed like didn’t grow. The others on the island went wild hairstyle after a long duration of not cutting their hair. Savage looks like that way. The writer implanted his great expectations on Piggy that a man fledged with wisdom was supposed to maintain his gentleman appearance.
7. Piggy’s asthma blocked his way of becoming a leader symbolically. To call an assembly a conch was blowed by the leader, but Piggy rejected to blow it for his asthma’s sake. It was set by the writer that he destined to be a man behind a leader.
Once you have read a symbolism work, in your eyes, whatever factors in the passage could be used to tell something in screct. It could be the case that you sometimes set up mysterious connections between A and C, even it may seem meaningless in others’ opinions. Yet that connection setting-up frequently pushes you to think, wins you fun. As a saying goes, every picture tells a story! In symbolism world, every factor bears some implication!