文章吧-经典好文章在线阅读:《Down and Out in Paris and London》读后感100字

当前的位置:文章吧 > 原创文章 >

《Down and Out in Paris and London》读后感100字

2020-12-23 01:34:59 来源:文章吧 阅读:载入中…

《Down and Out in Paris and London》读后感100字

  《Down and Out in Paris and London》是一本由George Orwell著作,Mariner Books出版的Paperback图书,本书定价:USD 14.95,页数:228,特精心从网络上整理的一些读者的读后感,希望对大家能有帮助。

  《Down and Out in Paris and London》精选点评:

  ●english 课程必读.

  ●Very vivid description of trampers in Paris and London. Eric Blair (George Orwell) detailed the feelings and routine life of those who tramped on the roads. After reading the novel in 12 days, I came to read the introduction again and found out a common fact: everyone has to endure substantial amount of hardship in order to achieve something.

  ●his humour tinge, his language immotal

  ●most loved novel of all times

  ●不喜欢里面的论述部分

  ●冷静,克制,幽默,utterly honest, lucid, without mercy or self-pity 。奥威尔是一个有悲悯心的人。描写贫穷和社会阶层分化特别棒的一篇纪实文学,毫不过时。

  ●很短又有趣的一本书。 十月份读书好少呀。→_→

  ●很多词都不常用。流浪汉的生活。

  ●看了原版才知道译本删减了这么多。

  ●今年跑了几次伦敦每次都匆匆总被撺掇去巴黎约了塞浦路斯,仍旧没存下钱,生活也负琐碎的压力也离底层遥远除了之言片句法国词外无法感同身受。是奥威尔擅长诡辩,还是贫穷让人成为狡辩者。

  《Down and Out in Paris and London》读后感(一):Notes

  借的书马上就overdue了,随手几点摘抄,以后一定买一本

  《Down and Out in Paris and London》读后感(二):贫穷的圣经

  在我的印象里,这一类的小说当中,唯一可以与本书匹敌的作品也许只有Emile Zola的L'Assommoir。我想George Orwell的这本书也是受到了Zola的自然主义流派的重大影响,它的诞生是基于现实主义的“大乘”观念之上,通过作者近似疯狂地科学考证,铸就而成的一部贫穷的圣经。Orwell在1984里说,自古以来的三个阶级当中,中产阶级总是抱有和富人对调的幻想,而穷人却终无翻身之日。在这本书里,他的解释更为透彻。他说,The problem is that intelligent, cultivated people, the very people who might be expected to have liberal opinions, never do mix with the poor. For what do the majority of educated people know about poverty? ... so remote is even hunger from the educated man's experience.

  从这种意义上来说,俄国作家之所以在文坛享誉盛名,不正得益于他们所处的社会更动荡,大众更贫困吗?而为何中国古代的开国皇帝们多半也不幸成为了整个朝代唯一的明君,道理恐怕也在于此。

  这本书所区别于一般的现实主义作品,它并未试图举起一支号角,为穷人叫惨喊冤,因之而带出一系列的阶级斗争论调。相反的,作者时刻保持着近乎第三者的旁观角度,从自己的角色扮演中超脱出来,用一种严谨的社会科学论调,在撰写这一篇大文章。他在旁观的同时,又通过细腻真切的笔法,让读者没有从字里行间感觉到一丝的故作清高或者假模假式。

  从这种意义上来说,安妮宝贝的很多故事,不也是把自身投入到每一段感情中去随波而逐,叙事时又从中超脱?不同者在于安妮是要通过感情的铺陈和渲染来达到以情动人的目的; 而Orwell则是要通过对于切身经历的描写来以理服人。

  于是在讲述完毕巴黎部分(as a Plongeur)的故事之后,他首先揭露了上述引用的这一个文人固疾,并坦陈巴黎餐饮业当中的诟病。然后在结束了英国部分(as a Tramp)之后, 试图为政府找到解决流民问题的药方。他虽然自谦于不能像Zola那样将事情罗列清晰,却从这两种角色扮演中,为上点明治世的药方,为中呼吁行文的良知,为下找寻生存的希望。

  自然,本书的结构乏善可陈,框架鲜明的同时,也缺乏深层次的细节上的挖掘。即便是经常濒临身无分文的境地,作者却又有闲情逸致来跟穷鬼朋友分享最后的晚餐;即便是混迹于流民之中,他也总是偏好于流民中的衣冠得体、志向未灭之辈;而每每站立于破产的悬崖当口,他又总得到各路神仙前来解困。未免没有刻意博取读者同情以及“深入群众”不够彻底的嫌疑。

  《Down and Out in Paris and London》读后感(三):Why care so much?

  The first published book by Geroge Orwell.Basically a simple story based on his personal experience.He used to work as a plongeur in a Russian Cafeteria in Paris and tramped almost a month in london street out of choice.

  Like always,learned from 1984 and animal farm,the words he used are simple,direct,but sharp. What really important is what he wanted to tell .

  ome details about his hard-up experience really shed my tears,not those difficult and unspeakable ones but the optimistic and interesting ones,like queer people he encountered on the road.Among so many different Cafeteria workers and tramps.Bozo I remember to be the most attractive one. Here are something Bozo said really touched me.

  quot;If you set yourself to it,you can live the same life,rich or poor.You can still keep on with your books and your ideas.you just got to say to yourself,'I'm a free man in here'-he tapped his forehead-,and you're all right"

  奥威尔在伦敦街头流浪时遇到的Bozo其人,是个粉笔画艺术家,或者说用粉笔画的方式乞讨的流浪者,他曾有工作有未婚妻,在未婚妻车祸死亡他借酒浇愁摔断一条腿之后开始了流浪生涯,他读过左拉莎士比亚,并有天文学爱好,跟奥威尔一边抽烟一边看天空谈论星星的颜色,他身上有种自由的东西近乎诗意,他对世界的看法近乎老庄。

  He might be ragged and even starving,but so long as he could read,think and watch for meteors,he was,as he said,free in his own mind.

  奥威尔这个人即便是在咖啡馆里洗盘子,在街头做乞丐,也不忘记观察生活观察形形色色的人,然后大发一段议论,例如咖啡馆段最后,他长篇大论总结,即便在咖啡馆里面,等级制度依然存在,等级制度无处不在。例如流浪伦敦最后,他提出流浪者解决方案,自建农场自给自足。他后来在1984和动物庄园中流露出的社会主义理想,集中体现在winston和snowball身上,在这本书里已经有了雏形,虽然远没有另外两本书具有深意,但是已经觉醒。有的人对政治,对人类的生存状态具备天生的自觉参与性,如非如此,为什么成千上万的洗碗工,成千上万的流浪者日复一日过着同样的日子,他非要不合时宜地牢骚满腹,为什么每个人都在旁观,鲁迅非要提笔骂人?那些到老还在对世界极其不满的人难道不可爱么,就像永远不死去的摇滚精神。

  o.

  Why did he care so much?

  Why didn't they care?

  Why didn't they care at all?

  Last question.

  Did it make any difference that he cared so much?

评价:

[匿名评论]登录注册

评论加载中……