《社会学是一种竞技》的观后感大全
《社会学是一种竞技》是一部由Pierre Carles执导，Pierre Bourdieu主演的一部纪录片类型的电影，特精心从网络上整理的一些观众的观后感，希望对大家能有帮助。
《社会学是一种竞技》精选点评：
●好長。
●看大佬谈笑风生 全程抄笔记
●总是笑得弯弯眼的布迪厄好可爱 要好好拜读布迪厄
●很有趣，可惜不熟悉布迪厄的理论，不过看个热闹。
●这个人不装B，不卖弄。讲起话来不那么自信，有点自言自语。仿佛依然怕别人嘲笑他的Gascon乡下口音。面对整个礼堂的美国学生，他在幕后有些尴尬地笑：“天哪，这么多人，真是让人紧张。”
●从某篇论文里布迪厄文化资本和社会资本的概念追过来的，可以说这个概念是布迪厄给了我启迪，一位真实的受人尊敬的世界级大师。前段时间美国高校录取政策变化，倾向于所继承的文化资本较低的群体，应该也是基于这种文化公平的理念吧。纪录片里说到左手温暖的社会公共服务，右手各种管制机构，左手少了就得右手补，社会成本要系统的看待，政策改变的影响迟滞性等等，学到很多。就是不明白这纪录片拍的这么乱七八糟是神马风格？扣一星给导演
●明明是布迪厄采访合集………为了老布打分
●布迪厄乃德里达的前卫银发与福柯的锃亮光头之综合：花白头发与高挑发际线下的锃亮额头。
●为布尔迪厄，给十星都嫌少。当然，纪录片观赏性减一星。合到一起，五星。
●此片荣获社会学家们最诚恳的推荐. “We all have very little scope for freedom, so everyone must do the little he can do to escape thelaws, the necessities, the determinisms.” Bourdieu is the first sociologist I want to write a letter to, but he died in 2002 when I was seven. M
《社会学是一种竞技》观后感(一)：记录
47’ 社会学家与自身经验的关系：福柯所做的是转化他的存在性问题，作为一个同性恋，他的痛苦，他的困惑，将这些转化为科学（学术）问题。换句话说，不是天生的同性恋倾向能产生好的社会学，而是原始经验，不论它是什么，能促成好的社会学。问题是如何在自己的经验中工作。
社会学家要做关于自己的社会学，对他们自己进行社会学分析。只有对自己的经验进行分析，才能社会学式地利用他的经验，一些东西复归于你，但他们在过程中被转化，你会更了解自己
58’ 论述男权社会对女性的统摄： 它是一种非常特殊的统治类型。不仅仅基于经济暴力（物质剥削），也不仅仅基于这样的事实，女性工作频率降低、离家自由变少，它建立在我所说的符号暴力的基础之上。这种暴力使人们在头脑中建立一定认知原则、看待事物的方式，而它们正是支配关系下的产物。换句话说，妇女参与到对她们自己的统治之中。
为了推翻它，战场在国家、学校等各种场合，不仅仅是在家中，让男性洗碗。
68’ 经济学的问题：举个例子，城市暴力的成本，当政府要我们研究暴力，他们想要让暴力滚蛋的秘方。答案是我们需要更多学校、社工、警察吗？学校确实起作用了吗？事实上，他们忽略了这些问题。暴力的原因，那些显而易见的现象，工作不稳定、时间的不安全感、未来不确定、从学校中被淘汰，一些学生因为他们的背景，注定要被学校系统淘汰。暴力的根源存在于整个结构之中。
当我们用纯经济的方式来制定社会政策，节省开支，如裁员，一端的节省会导致另一端的问题。我们拥有非常糟糕的经济，建立在经济和社会分离的基础上。
《社会学是一种竞技》观后感(二)：Sociology is a martial art
这部对布迪厄跟拍的而成的纪录片不是普识介绍，倒是对布迪厄以及他的学术工作与社会实践的白描，其中甚至不乏尴尬的片刻。但总归，电影实实在在地展现了他自己说的这一点：“Sociology is a martial art. Like all martial arts, to be used in self-defense and any foul play is strictly forbidden”.
布迪厄有积极对谈的姿态和真正社会学家的包容谦逊态度。让-吕克·戈达尔会给他写信过来，他一边看信纸上打印的画面，一边说戈达尔肯定想表达些什么，然后笑着说自己没看出来；和德国作家君特格拉斯对谈新自由主义。（刚刚检索发现豆瓣已经有人翻译了：https://site.douban.com/127630/widget/notes/5570726/note/344174299/）
当然更多是在和学生和普通人谈，在地方做讲座时，布迪厄对骂社会学家的观众苦口婆心地说，不要因为知识分子用了些大词就恨他们，也不要因为你们合理的义愤而使自己失去接近智识的机会。
这话放到2020年来看，可谓是一语成谶。
所以讲座结束后，他边走边和身旁人说，烧汽车的社会运动可以，是要有目标的。
以我自己感受而言，中国的社会学家离公众更远，专业之间的藩篱也更深，另一面社会学的公众声誉甚至更不堪和边缘，当然这与结构性问题有关。而当面来自普通人的“社会学有什么意义”的责问时，我们的社会学家或许更窘迫吧。毕竟想想也觉困难，在我们这里你甚至很难像布迪厄说出一句，“你可以做什么去改变”，有时，在中国的语境下这么说一句甚至有些残忍，而很难说要鼓励谁参与social movements，去改变。
.S 今年毕业衫上印了布迪厄这句社会学是一种竞技的原文，这部电影之前看了一小半，今天总算是补完了。从本片的诸多细节都不难看出布迪厄对他的学术工作的诚挚的爱意，即便他自己也记不清怎么走上社会学这条路，并且这种热情真有传染力，我能感觉到。6.17
《社会学是一种竞技》观后感(三)：Notes of Bourdieu's Words.
Inertia, social reproduction
Q: does inequality have purpose？
A: it is a politics issue, it is complicated and I can't answer it.
When you ask a scientific question, you should put politics aside. Inequality is a basic social reality and it is not right or wrong.
17:21
Ask "what are his social reasons for saying that？"
ociology is a martial art. Like all martial arts, to be used in self-defense and any foul play is strictly forbidden
25:59
I never said he should, I say "you have to find a way to make him."
Men also suffer from chauvinism
Q: can you summarize masculine values and feminine values？
A: I never say masculine values but....
Q: Not as a sociologist, but a man.
A: I am fond of the feminine value but remember that they are largely the product of male domination
Q: they are not their own？
A: No. they are not part of women's nature. It is my personal opinion that women has properties/characteristics that are more attractive than men's. They are more ..... What I should say is "they are more likely to be like that" in a statistical way. And that's fine.
29:20
Q: What should one do to be happy？
A: I don't know
Q:So sociologists can't answer that, can give no hope, can only point out the laws？
A: He can give some answer, his personal opinion, but not as a sociologist.
Q: what is your personal opinion？
A: One must do what little on can to change things. Yes I think that is it. We all have very little scope for freedom, so everyone must do the little he can do to escape the laws, the necessities, the determinisms.
What a beautiful thing but I don't understand any. I am not poet! (haa)
(Director) he is testing you. If you don't understand the same thing he does, you can't
o, I understand that bit. But afterwards, when he says... well, whatever!
oor old Bourdieu.
Foucault transformed them into scientific questions. He fought all his life to elaborate. There are many homosexuals but only one Foucault.
In the same way, it is not experience that leads to good sociology. The problem is how to use one's own experience in a useful way. As I always say, you have to use reflexive analysis. Sociologists have to invent their own sociology, analyzing themselves
01:07:21
it is said that a committed intellectual is involved in politics. It is not true. A committed intellectual is involved in the public arena which may be political, but without abandoning the ordinary demands of his everyday activity as a researcher.
01:08:25
That kind of generalization is intolerable to a sociologist. "Universities", all together, are like a 68-foot tortoise, they don't exist. Which universities do you mean？ You need to be precise.
What we need to fight this is delicate surgery.
You can't say what you said. It is not universities in general.
I think and this is not censorship that if we talk like that, someone should answer, "Sir I agree to some extent but not wholeheartedly."
The economy of happiness
ocial cost and expenses are largely underestimated.
What is social is economic.
01:16:50
ocial science is already telling us that measures which seen quite rational economically... those economic measures have terrible effects, which are not secondary but primary
.
quot;I am not a moralist. If you like being like that... but it is stupid!"
01:20:00-24:00
an interesting process of academic discussion
01:33:00 On writing
(Even Bourdieu will say) deadlines are a way of keeping control of you.
I am sorry to say but at least for the serious writing phase, writing a book takes at least three months to think. There are thousands of little decisions. "Do I use this or that？"
I think neo-liberal revolution is a conservative revolution which seems to reinstate the past, to return to the past, and yet calls itself progressive. Regression becomes progress.
I don’t feel very wise tonight.
2:01:40 Bourdieu in a political discussion with the public
We are all full of prejudice. One reason that a sociologist’s work is so difficult, is because he is also full of prejudice and he has as much of a struggle against his own as against others.
A housing estate psychiatrist？ That is just insulting.
It is too easy to denounce people who are, yes, scabs. They are scabs.
(do not be anti-intellectualism)
You would get tools for understanding this. Don’t let your righteous indignation which is totally justified blind you and deprive you of the tools of understanding.
All those books help us regain our identity, the history of our parents’ generation…
If that sounds arrogant, what the hell! I am not preaching for your good. I don’t give a damn. But don’t deprive yourselves of these intellectual resources. Intellectualism is not a disease.
Address: 52 Rue du Cardinal Lemoine. Also the address the College de France
