《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》影评10篇
《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》是一部由Paul Sen执导，史蒂夫·乔布斯 / Robert X. Cringely主演的一部纪录片类型的电影，文章吧小编精心整理的一些观众的影评，希望对大家能有帮助。
《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》影评(一)：完美诠释了什么叫Keep hungry
专门找了个安静的时间，好好看看，一个多小时的访谈花了三四个小时去领略。
星期天的夜晚，看这个太过合适。虽然今天不太平静，但很感谢适时的提醒。
虽然有些观点已经被语录转载烂了，粗看甚至有些鸡汤味儿，但今天看到对面的乔布斯，真诚又平静地慢慢讲出来的时候，还是觉得很震撼甚至有些感动。
【keep hungry】
在他12岁的时候，看到有人可以免费打电话，就去探其究竟
在他40岁这年，依旧如故
曾经以好奇宝宝自居的我，工作中常被日常繁琐事务盖住了双眼，赶路途中忘记了停下脚步仰望星空
再次看到他，分明是行走的标杆，初心好奇心再次点燃，无论对待工作还是生活，皆因如他这般
【领导力】
leader是什么：
1.用专业树立权威，赢得尊重，并且敢于说出“我是对的”“按我说的办”（赞同鑫鑫君点评的易烊千玺在这就是街舞节目里的表现）
2.直接或让人更容易接受的方式，拿出置信的依据，提醒对方你错了u are doing a shit
3.可以坚持己见，但不能固执，如果发现自己错了要及时承认并修正错误，毕竟结果最重要
【生活的意义】
做这件事儿是为了什么，这么做是为了什么，
现阶段是为了什么，
生活是为了什么……
感谢适时的提醒，我大概像只弹簧，需要阶段性的施压，压的越狠，弹得越高
《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》影评(二)：写程序就像写作 程序员其实就是作家
大概有50%的内容在triumph of nerds里面看过了，但这个采访更完整，更连续了一些。
AT&T设计的电话系统有个致命的缺陷，信号的频率采用了人能发出的频率范围，使得人可以模仿特定的频率去打电话，帮主模仿了一下，感觉很像，三个星期就破解了。
教主谈了好多product的概念，是为了帮助那些不是hardware person的人，电脑需要装好，拿来就能用，不需要担心组装的问题。
不需要成本核算，如果需要成本核算，说明，你对所需的细节还不够了解，了解的还不够多，当你足够了解的时候，不存在成本核算的问题，不需要计算，多钱就是多钱,。
我也认为每个人都应该学习编程，这是一种很好的思考方式。从构思到实现，从编程到运行跑一遍，计算机在运行程序的时候，就是在运行你的思想。这是一个好的思维训练。写程序就像写作写小说一样，程序员其实就是作家，或者是作曲家，写程序就像写作，类似一个剧本，跟编剧是同行。
对于技术公司来说，product person 知道怎样做更好的产品，而对于百事这样的公司，他的产品就是汽水瓶子的形状，没了，这种公司是靠营销人员驱动的，百事可以这样活，但科技公司不行，科技公司的灵魂是产品，怎样才能做出更好的产品，而只有product person 才知道，营销人员是不知道的。
great product 需要的是 content，只有product person才知道 content，才精通 content，而不是 IBM 的 process. IBM 曾经通过某种 process 做出了成功的产品, 但 IBM 自己却认为那是因为 process 让它成功的, 把这种 process 固定下来, 让它成为公司的规章制度, 误以为只要按照这个 process 来, 下一个产品也会成功, 大错特错.
教主在谈到Xerox可能成为 IBM，可能成为Microsoft的时候，有一种诡异的微笑，像是故意卖萌的感觉。这个微笑已经看过好多次了，还是那么意味深长。
当年乔布斯能搞到15美元的鼠标，如果鼠标300美元一只，GUI的魅力可能也会大打折扣。而现在的鼠标大概也是这个价钱。
eXT就是当年教主在 Palo Alto 看到的除GUI之外的OOP，还有网络，网络大家都在做，不是NeXT一家，剩下的就是OOP了。
教主打了一个喷嚏。
产品的设计如果没有最初的灵魂（taste)，就是 Microsoft 的产品，而之所以Microsoft的产品能够如此成功，是因为消费者也同样不知道产品的灵魂（no taste)。
产品的设计是设计者设计来为了跟其他的用户交流，产品是一种交流媒介，而电脑是所有的媒介当中，最有力量的一种。所有其他的产品无法实现的交流，表达，好像最终都是由电脑实现了。
《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》影评(三)：What's so interesting
12岁见hp创始人并获得零件和实习机会，这种事对童年的确影响巨大。
14岁从esquire上得知并制造出能免费打电话的blue box，一直把电话打到梵蒂冈、吵醒教皇。所做即所得也是巨大成就感。
What's so interesting is that we were young, and learned that we could build something, ourselves, that could control billions of dollars worth of infrastructures in the world.
下一个鼓捣的东西就是终端机，Apple I 诞生。把车和计算器卖了，开始印刷电路，规模化生产起步。实际上从一开始就是制造业，硬件。不是虚幻的高科技。
19分钟对folklore的描述和举例太精确了。佩服。还有可口可乐、施乐和IBM怎么因为垄断从科技型、产品型公司，变成了销售主导公司。
访谈好在全是故事和细节。理论化的人常常抗拒把自己的人生用节点和故事来分段，但事实证明的确存在trigger的，无论你怎么称呼。
记者提问也很优秀。基本和我想问的一样（除了我没做功课的那些）。
《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》影评(四)：《Steve Jobs: The Lost Interview》引发思考的关键词不完全总结
1. Steve举了一个他童年时候的例子，一位邻居将几块丑陋的石头放到了易拉罐里，然后放在一个由咖啡机和驱动机相连接的那么一个自制的机器里，第二天，这些丑陋的石头变成了非常漂亮光滑的石头。Steve说，great team work is like this. People argue, work together and fight against ideas but they polish each other.
2. “People got confused that the process is the content…. I found that the best people are the ones that really understand the content… and that’s what made great product. It is not process. It’s content.”
这就是Steve对他存在的行业和他自己的价值本身的精确描述：Content and understand the content.
3. “It (the computer) is the most awesome tool that we ever invented.” 关键词Tool.
4. “Ultimately, it comes down to taste. It comes down to trying to expose yourself to the best things that humans have done, and try to bring those things into what you are doing. And I think part of what made the Mac great is that people working on it were musicians and poets and artists and zoologists and historians, who also happen to be the best computer scientist in the world. But if it hadn’t been for computer science, these people would have all been doing amazing things in life in other fields. And they brought with them, we all bought to this effort, a very liberal arts air, attitude that we wanted to pull in the best that we saw in these other fields, that we saw in other fields into this field. And I don’t think you get that if you’re very narrow.” 关键词“cross-field”
5. “ To me, the spark of that (Hippy) was that there was something beyond what you see every day. Beyond just a job and a family, and two cars in the garage, and a career. There is something more going on. There is another side of the coin that we don’t talk about much. And we experience it when there is gap, when we just aren’t really, when everything is not ordered and perfect, when there is kind of a gap. You experienced this inrush of something. Found out what it is. Hippie movement got a little bit of that, and they wanted to find out what that was about and that life is not about what they saw what their parents about doing…. And it’s the same thing that causes people to wanna be poets instead of bankers. And I think that’s a wonderful thing and I think that the same spirit can be put into products and those products can be manufactured and given to people and they can sense that spirit.” 关键词“Gap” ”find out”
6. “They work with computer is because computer is best capable of transmitting some feeling that you have, that you want to share with other people. This is the medium that I think I can say something in.” 关键词Medium
《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》影评(五)：Why -> How -> What
Describe the circumstances with well-defined direction
earch the possible tools and solution
Accomplish it in the right way with right person
=====
1.On Why Xeros crushed and buried？
I actually thought a lot about that, and I learned more about that with John Sculley later on and I think I understand that now pretty well. What happens is, like with John Sculley, err... John came from Pepsi co., and they almost would change their product once every 10 years, to them, new product is like a new size of bottle, so if you are a product person, you couldn't change the course of that company very much. So who influences the success of Pepsi co.？ -The sales and marketing people, therefore they would once get promoted and therefore they would once run the company, well, for Pepsi co., that might have been okay. But it turns out the same thing can happen in technology companies, that they get monopolies, like old IBM and Xerox. If you are a product person at IBM or Xerox, so you make a better cop or a better computer, so what？ When you have a monopolies market share, the company is not any more successful, so the people who can make the company more successful are sales and marketing people. And they end up running the companies, and the product people get driven out of this decision making forms. And the companies forget what it means to make great products. It... sort of the product sensibility. And... the product genius brought them to that monopolistic position gets rotted out by people running this companies who have no conception of a good product versus and bad product, and they really have no feeling in their hearts usually about wanting to really help the customers.
2.On professionalism: institutionalized process vs. content
In my career, I found that the best people you know are the ones who really understand the content, and they are pain in the butt to manage, you know but you put up with it because they are so great at the content, and that's what makes a great product, it's not process, it's content.
3. Teamwork with A-players
...through that group of incredibly talented people bumping up against each other, having arguments, having fights sometimes, making some noise, and working together they polish each other, and they polish the ideas, and what comes out are these beautiful stones.
Most things in life, the dynamic range between average and the best, is at most 2 to 1...In software, and it used to be the case with hardware too, the difference between average and the best is 15 to 1, maybe a 100 to 1, okay？
When you get really good people, they know they are really good, and you don't have to baby people's ego so much, and what really matters is the work, that everybody knows that and that all that matters is the work, so people are being counted on to do specific pieces of little puzzle, and the most important thing I think you can do for somebody who's really good, and who's really being counted on is to point out to them when their work isn't good enough, and to do it very clearly and to articulate why, and to get them back on track. And you need to do it in a way that doesn't call in questions about your confidence and abilities, but...leaves not too much room for interpretation that the work they have done for the particular thing is not good enough... to support the goal of the team. And that's a hard thing to do. err...I always take a very direct approach, so I think if you talk to people who worked with me, err... the really good people have found it beneficial, some people hated it you know, but... I am also one of these people, I don't really care about being right, I just care about success. So you will find a lot of people that would tell you that I had a very strong opinion, and they present evidence in contrary and 5 minutes later I can change my mind, because I'm like that, I don't mind being wrong. And I admit that I am wrong a lot, doesn't really matter to me too much. What matters to me is that we do the right thing.
4.What's the right direction？
You know ultimately it comes down to taste, it comes down to taste, it comes down to trying to expose yourself to the best things that humans have done, and try to bring these things in to what you are doing. Picasso had a saying "good artists copy, great artists steal." We have always been shameless about stealing great ideas, and I think part of what made the Macintosh great was that people working on it were musicians, and poets, and artists, and zoologists, and historians, who also happened to be the best computer scientists in the world. But if it hadn't been computer science, these people would have all been doing amazing things in other fields, and they all brought with them, we all brought to this effort a very liberal arts sot of air, a very liberal arts attitude that we want to pull in the best that we saw in other fields into this field, and I don't think you'll get that if you are very narrow.
《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》影评(六)：品味决定一切
看完乔布斯的采访，给我印象最深的是他很珍惜人才他觉得人才才是一个公司发展的核心其次是他对计算机行业的巨大热情使他完成一个又一个行业奇迹他更像革新者.他完全改变了人们固有的思维模式就如他所说编程是一种思考方式.确实苹果的运用是独树一帜的.他对界面图形的要求非常苛刻
这说明他对美的事物要求很高.我想最好的商人都是艺术家.他们不惜一切代价把自己想要的东西做到极致.这往往是天才能完成的事.采访中他对未来畅想人类已经包裹在这张网里面.它已经渗透到每个人的日常生活中.新媒体的产生如巨龙一般.跨行跨界的产品已经超出人类的想象.微信威逼移动.支付宝威逼银行
就像乔布斯在采访中说到的那样.人类进入了共享时代.思维模式不再局限于传统的思考.计算机打开了人类前行的另一扇大门.有意思的是乔布斯说到他是嬉皮士的话题.苹果的成功来自各行优秀人才的集思广益.他们不做书呆子我想这才是这个世纪人们最接近科技自由的时代.乔布斯不是第一个吃苹果的,对吧
Ultimately everything comes down to the taste.：）
《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》影评(七)：乔布斯的态度和价值观
1. 制度和流程没法创造出来产品。当然中国很多公司不是为了创造，只是希望抄袭，吃现成的！
2. 创意和产品之间是有距离的，不是有了创意就一定能实现，很多创意可能无法实现，而且产品研发的过程涉及到大量环节需要去整合和平衡，所以过程很重要，需要把各种想法思路进行组合。在这个产品过程中，团队进行协作、争吵、辩论等等充分的碰撞，最后才能打磨出好的产品。
3. 微软的优势：一、善于捕捉机会，二、锲而不舍。缺点：只会模仿，产品很平庸，没有灵魂和魅力。但是老百姓照样也是买账的，毕竟大部分人其实也没那么有品位，哈哈！我还是很喜欢微软的东西，够用就行。
4. 君子善假于物也，计算机、自行车、秃鹫、效率，老乔的工作热情在于创造更好的工具推动人类的进步。
5. 如何确定自己的方向是对的。关键在于品味。品味来自哪里，来自你对人类各个领域优秀成果的领悟，并他们应用到你的产品中。我赶脚那就是对美的追求，而美是相通的。另外，团队跨领域的融合往往能产生美。（计算机、诗、音乐等等）
6. jobs理解的嬉皮士精神是什么？拒绝平庸，摆脱束缚，追求自由？把一种精神融入到产品中，并希望用户在使用时能感受到这种精神。现代做品牌很流行玩这套，NIKE——just do it！重在传递一种精神，而不只是功能。
《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》影评(八)：不谈是非，只重结果
在采访中可以很明显地感受到乔布斯对苹果的爱，对它一度失败的遗憾跟痛心。也觉得他在承认错误时的坦然与偶尔的固执十分接地气。
但于我而言最有价值的还是他的两点看法，一是公司核心部门的争论，在一家已经占领市场大部分份额的大公司里，靠什么来保有以及增长。产品才是最能贴近、打动并且留住用户的东西，永远不能忽视产品的重要性。而自己一度还因为毕业后将要工作的公司核心是产品，而自己的岗位太边缘而纠结，现在看来难免太狭隘。如果公司以后故步自封不再专注产品，那才是灾难。财务人员还是老老实实地做支持，总有以财务自己独有的方式发光发亮的时候~第二个则是他谈到的团队工作状态，与优秀自信的人工作永远不用害怕会伤害到他的自尊，不谈是非，只看重结果。在某快消巨头面试时也能很明显地感受到他们的结果导向。一心只想着把工作做好，其他皆是浮云。以此自勉。
《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》影评(九)：Some points which impressed me a lot.-<遗失的访谈观后感>
有四点是印象特别深刻，并且被深深触动的。
1. He is very proud of his team. He said all of them are all A players. 但是即使这是一群世界上最牛逼最聪明的人；他就是有办法让他们为他工作。我觉得从今天商业的角度来说，Steve绝壁是个完美的team leader以及motivator.虽然他激励人的方式有时候真的是极其残忍和刺激。但是有什么关系呢。正如他说的I don't care if I am right or wrong. I care about the work, the outcome.如果你认为我是错的，那么你用你的逻辑你的证据来说服我。如果你能说服我，那我就承认我是错的。真的很佩服。很多大人物或者自认为聪明的人，他往往容不得别人说自己是错的。所以正如Walter Isaacson的《斯蒂夫乔布斯传》里面写到的，那些真正能说服乔布斯的人都能赢得他的极大尊重。
2.记者Cringley问他年纪轻轻就能成功把公司经营地那么好，有什么诀窍吗？乔布斯很认真地想了一会开始说：“Jobs: (long pause) You know, throughout my years in business I discovered something. I would always ask why you do things. The answers that I would invariably get are: “Oh, that’s just the way things are done around here.” Nobody knows why they do what they do. Nobody thinks very deeply about things in business. That’s what I found.”。看到这个我又想起了这本书：
《史蒂夫·乔布斯：遗失的访谈》影评(十)：产品、公司和品位
1、做公司就是做产品
乔布斯从12岁开始，就捣鼓着好玩有用的产品，在惠普兼职的那些日子，也让他体会到了科技的魅力，原来凭一个人的力量也可以有如此之大的影响力，也是在惠普他认识了沃兹尼亚克。
Apple II发布时，乔布斯年仅21岁，从此之后，他的财富不断增加，23岁一百万，24岁一千万，25岁一亿美元。但是钱并不是乔布斯认为最重要的东西，重要的是人才、产品，是产品带给用户的价值。
做产品要深入的每一个细节，要去控制成本，就必须知道每一个步骤的精确成本，他也建议所有人都去学习一下编程，学习这种思考问题的方式。
乔布斯举了百事可乐的例子，来说明大公司为什么会失败，因为一旦公司做大，形成垄断市场之后，产品数十年也不会发生多大的变化，而且这些垄断的市场也很难再提高业绩，要提高业绩还得靠营销部门，最终营销人员挤走了产品人员，而营销人员并不懂产品，这情形在百事可乐这样的公司没问题，但在科技公司就会造成悲剧。
光靠流程和制度，是不能让公司持续成功的，必须全心全意放在产品上。
2、如何使公司良好运转
对于传统行业来说，最好和普通之间，差距可能就是百分之几十的样子，但是对科技行业来说，最好的与普通的人才，能力的差距可能达百倍，所以一流的公司需要一流的人才，一流的人才也愿意与一流的人才共事。
团队的协作过程，就像磨石机的工作过程一样，会有摩擦会有障碍，这是必然的，以乔布斯的理解来看，真正优秀的人，只想成功，不在乎是非，用事实说话，其他的都不重要，他认为优秀的人也不太需要你太在乎他们的自尊。
大约这就是他被谣传暴戾的原因吧，从访谈中可以看的出，他确实不太在乎事实之外的东西，他自己也会犯错，别人也可以说服他，只要基于事实就好。
3、品位问题
毫无疑问，乔布斯的品位很好，他认为和在大学时旁听排版课程的关系密不可分，的确，内容永远都是最重要的，并且，字体设计那些细致入微的细节，也对他有很深的影响。
微软是一个成功的公司，善于抓住机遇，但是他们的产品毫无品位，是三流的，或许没有苹果，微软的产品会更糟糕，没有灵魂，非常平庸，但是更令人可悲的是用户并不以为然。
人类应该追求极致，并分享给同类。
乔布斯也从来不觉得借鉴别人的创意是可耻的，笨拙的工匠只会抄，灵巧的工匠会借鉴的恰到好处，苹果的产品非常确切的说明了这个事实。
6、70年代的嬉皮士运动给乔布斯留下了深刻印象，他认为嬉皮士是去努力寻找生活的真相的一群人，他们觉得生活不应该是父母过的那样。嬉皮士的出发点是可贵的。也正是因为这种精神，有人宁愿当诗人也不愿做银行家。
乔布斯很欣赏这种精神，他也想把这种精神溶入到产品中。只要用户使用产品，就能感受到这种精神，如果与Macintosh的用户交谈，会发现他们喜爱这个产品，在此之前，你很少听人说真心喜欢某个商业产品——是的，但你可以从Macintosh感受到某种奇妙的东西。