《时间简史》观后感精选10篇
《时间简史》是一部由埃罗尔·莫里斯执导，史蒂芬·霍金 / Isobel Hawking / Janet Humphrey主演的一部纪录片 / 传记类型的电影，特精心从网络上整理的一些观众的观后感，希望对大家能有帮助。
《时间简史》观后感(一)：也太简洁了吧
惊叹这么好的题材、大量珍贵的镜头和史料、照片，居然简洁成这个样子！也很好奇哪个导演拍片能拍到这种地步！还是后期给处理掉了？
堪称洁本之最！
84分钟，科普不到家。
《时间简史》观后感(二)：物理学巨匠
这部片子其实是人物传记，向霍金致敬的纪录片，霍金的残疾导致了他的研究工作被迫改变了方向性和方式，也增加了他对研究的专注度，结果反而导致了一些重要成果的产生，真是令人惊叹，本狼是物理苦手，很多物理名词不懂啥意思，比如量子力学，奇点等等，凑合着看了看，外行看个热闹吧，片子是1991年的，距离现在已经25年，恐怕很多理论已经有更新或者被推翻了吧
《时间简史》观后感(三)：斯蒂芬·霍金的世界：《时间简史》电视版（6VCD）
当今世界上最伟大的科学家斯蒂芬·霍金以他的睿智与热诚，加上浅白的讲解为我们细述各种复杂的宇宙理论，让我们了解到人类如何一步步地探索宇宙，怎样了解行星、星体、星系、宇宙，甚至物质的特性。宇宙的存在与意义，人类的存在及其意义，在20世纪结束的时候，我们好像终于到达了解开宇宙之谜的边缘，也许都能从中找到答案。
号称BBC最负盛名科教片
【目录】
宇宙炼金术
关于宇宙暗面
黑洞及其它
一切问题的答案
《时间简史》观后感(四)：时间简史
制作 Channel 4
美国票房 230万刀（在1992年不少了）
IMDB 7.5（3000+票）
2，点点星辰中冒出一只鸡……
13.50，神童
19.30，得病
28，恋爱
28.50，研究宇宙起源
32，研究黑洞
43.30，病情恶化
51.30，日常趣事
58，虚时间论
62.30，失语
67，时间倒流论
70.30，哲学问题
73.50，大塌缩
75.30，车祸
美/肖恩·罗森汉姆
•杰西·阿诺德 《奇怪的收缩人》1957
1-人设相似：崇高感。不仅来自人类在，在面对寂静宇宙时发出的存在意义上的孤独，而且来自主人公被进一步地被驱逐出了整个人类社会的境遇。…生活情况的避而少谈…一个处在近乎绝对孤独状态中，一个被囚禁在灰暗的没有友谊的时空中的人。
3-对引力的关注：楼梯间的掉落 爬楼梯的锻炼 轮椅从斜坡上跌落 学生语：地球引力大师被微弱的地球引力折服。
4-人的精神：人的意识是竖直向上的，奋力战胜地球引力、向上攀登的搏斗中得到了体现。想起他的意志和勇气，而且让人想起他从剑桥的楼梯跌落下来之后回答自己的提问时付出的持久努力：我是谁？我从哪里发现自己？
•黑洞隐喻
时间与黑洞是与死亡相联系的。而霍金本人被描绘成一个自我碰撞自我容纳的黑洞，事界只能通过他那张表情古怪的脸和他得以跟外界沟通的三个手指的动作才能发生破裂。（信息内爆的危险，即完全无法通过任何手段跟外界交流，他将成为一件沉默的物体，无法确认或否认他自己内心的经验。）
•人与机器
1-人的诞生：
弗洛伊德 子宫：最早的家
克劳迪娅·斯宾格勒 人类通过与计算机相互作用所产生的性爱般的快感。
人类的生命既不能在粒子物理层次上生存，也无法在宇宙论层次上生活。而置人类的尘世存在于不顾，就等于无视产生人类认同的社会子宫。
“广袤的宇宙，神奇而辉煌，它肯定意味着什么。那么我也意味着什么。”
宇宙 神 万物理论 ？
黄铜闹钟齿轮大特写———直到启蒙时期占主导地位的宇宙学隐喻是把上帝比作钟表制作者。
霍金身体部分的生硬特写———把身体分解成了碎片，机械零件似的
分割视像 脱离肉体的声音———人际交流的瓦解 无处可在更是无处不在
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
•氛围营造：仿《星际迷航》音乐 太空的长空镜 开头神秘鸡 结尾神秘的名牌和红灯
•对霍金的私生活避而不谈 但一个办公室的镜头留给了他和他墙上的梦露 和他书架上的一任妻子
•机械感还来自于模拟人声的发音机器 ：无语气变化的平稳朗读，也因此产生科幻感和未来感
《时间简史》观后感(六)：「Quotes」
「Which came first, the chicken or the egg？ Did the universe have a beginning, and if so, what happened before then？ Where did the universe come from, and where is it going？」
「How real ie time？ Will it ever come to an end？ Where does the difference between the past and the future come from？ Why do we remember the past, but not the future？」
「Well,coxes can be adventurous, and some coxes can be very steady people. He was rather an adventurous type. You never knew quite what he was going to do when he went out with the crew. I think he used to bring his work with him into the boat sometimes. His sort of thinking gear was going on different levels.」
「We were asked to read chapter 10 in a book called Electricity and Magnetism by Bleaney and Bleaney, an unlikely combination, a husband-and-wife team, and at the end of that chapter, there were 13 questions, all of them final honors questions. I discovered very rapidly that I couldn't do any of them. Richard and I worked together for the week, and we managed to do 1½ questions which we felt very proud of. Gordon refused all assistance and managed to do one all by himself. Stephen, as always, hadn't even started but the next morning, he went up to his room at 9:00. And we came back about 12:00, maybe five past 12:00, and down came Stephen, and we were in the college gateway, the lodge. "Ah, Hawking," I said, "How many have you managed to do, then？" "Well," he said, "I've only had time to do the first ten."
I think at that point we realized that it's not just we weren't in the same street. We weren't on the same planet.」
「He used to produce his work every week for tutorial, and, as he never kept any notes or papers or that sort of thing, on leaving my room,he would normally throw it in my wastepaper basket. And when he was with other undergraduates at the tutorial and they saw this happen, they were absolutely horrified 'cause they thought,he did this work in probably half an hour. If they could have done it in a year, they wouldn't have thrown it in the wastepaper basket. They would've put it in a frame on their walls.」
「Before my condition had been diagnosed I had been very bored with life. There had not seemed to be anything worth doing. But shortly after I came out of hospital I dreamt that I was going to be executed. I suddenly realized there were a lot of worthwhile things I could do if I were reprieved.」
「Roger Penrose proved that a dying star,collapsing under its own gravity, eventually shrinks to a singularity, a point of infinite density and zero size. I realized that if I reversed the direction of time, so that the collapse became an expansion, I could prove that the universe had a beginning. But my proof based on Einstein's theory of general relativity, also showed that we cannot understand how the universe began, because it showed that all scientific theories including general relativity itself, break down at the beginning of the universe.」
「Black hole radiation has shown us that gravitational collapse is not as final as we once thought. If an astronaut falls into a black hole, he will be returned to the rest of the universe in the form of radiation. Thus,in a sense, the astronaut will be recycled. However,it would be a poor sort of immortality because any personal concept of time would come to an end as he is torn apart inside the black hole.」
「My interest in the origin and fate of the universe was reawakened when I attended a conference on cosmology in the Vatican. Aftewards,we were granted an audience with the pope. He told us that it was all right to study the evolution of the universe after the Big Bang, but we should not inquire into the Big Bang itself because that was the moment of creation and therefore the work of God. I was glad that he did not know the subject of the talk I had just given, the possibility that the universe had no beginning, no moment of creation.」
「So long as the universe had a beginning. We could suppose it had a creator. But if the universe is completely self-contained, having no boundary or edge, it would neither be created nor destroyed. It would simply be. What place,then,for a creator？ 」
「He does believe very intensely, in the almost infinite possibility of the human mind. You have to find out what you can't know before you know you can't, don't you？ So I don't think that thought should be restricted at all. Why shouldn't you go on thinking about the unthinkable？ Somebody's got to start sometime. Think how many things were unthinkable a century ago, and yet people have thought them. And often they also seemed quite unpractical. Not all the things Stephen says probably are to be taken as gospel truth. He's a searcher. He's looking for things. And sometimes he probably talks nonsense. Well, don't we all？ But the point is people must think. People must go on thinking. They must try to extend the boundaries of knowledge, and they don't sometimes even know where to start. You don't know where the boundaries are, do you？ You don't know what your taking-off point is.」
「If we do discover a complete theory of the universe, it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few scientists. Then we shall all philosophers, scientists, and just ordinary people be able to take part in the discussion of why it is that we and the universe exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason, for then we would know, the mind of God.」